• Pages

  • About me

• Blog Categories

  • Books (2)
  • Business (3)
  • Computers (22)
    • Linux (27)
  • Mobile Internet (12)
  • Multimedia (1)
  • Programming (12)
    • Java (17)
    • Prolog (2)
    • Ruby (21)
  • Ramblings (17)
  • Search (10)
    • Lucene (1)
  • Web 2.0 (5)

• Blog Archives

  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005

• Licence

  

  The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License.

Why do default implementations have such bad names?

Spread the word: related  |  related  |  bookmark it!  |  digg it!  |  reddit!

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 17th, 2006 at 2:20 pm and is filed under Java. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Why do default implementations have such bad names?”

1. JD says:
   June 17th, 2006 at 9:25 pm
   
2. James says:
   June 19th, 2006 at 9:04 am
   
3. Miles says:
   June 19th, 2006 at 11:58 am
   
4. JD says:
   June 19th, 2006 at 2:22 pm
   
5. Miles says:
   June 19th, 2006 at 2:58 pm
   

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.